RSS Feed

Black Holes Grow Mass by Feeding on Swirling Dense Cold Gaseous Filaments Containing Superfluid Helium

Kyle Stewart’s computer simulation shows how Galaxies grow by feeding on cold gas swirling into the theoretically inferred singularity region at the galactic core center. Stars form by condensation inside cold filaments, especially near galaxy centers. Stewart writes that “Galaxies came to be from bits of matter that were connected together by filaments.” Cold gas follows the filaments and flows into the galaxy center faster than previously believed, and dark matter also funnels faster than previously believed into the galaxy center along the filaments. It’s just as if the cold magnetized plasma gaseous filaments actually produce their need for inventing and attaching a dark matter gravitational force. Cold filaments containing single atom thick liquid helium atoms have inherent magnetic levitation phenomena, that can fully refute and explain away the problematic dark matter mystery and gravitational singularity.

Cold Gas Filaments Swirl Into a Singularity to Feed Growing “Black Holes” finds Kyle Stewart.

Cold Fronts Shape the Formation of Galaxies – Plasma astrophysics
“Sloshing Cold Fronts in Galaxy Groups like IC 1860 Shape New Formation Models”

Video: Quantum Vortices in Superfluid Helium mathematically analogs relativity, mimicking gravitational black hole physics. Cosmic scale self-similar galactic filaments are in a vortex state, that compares to the physics of quantum vortices in superfluid helium. Magnetic levitation phenomena of superfluid helium is well demonstrated in labs. Cold filaments connect to spinning galaxy superfluid core regions shaping cosmic phenomena by magnetic fields, instead of by dark matter and black holes. Quantum vortices carry the angular momentum of the superfluid, and are theoretically similar to a superconductor’s flux lines that carry the magnetic field created by electric current traveling through them. Electromagnetism shapes the Universe.

Spiraling Cold Gas Funnels Into Theoretically Unseen Black Holes. Helium-4 atoms condensing into a superfluid inside filaments behave as a single collective entity that constituents the spinning black hole core region.

The Hot Air Goes Out of Gravitational Theory Forming Galaxies 

The previous standard gravity model of galaxy formation held that hot gas sank inwards into the centers of galaxies from all directions and got hotter. Cold-Mode theory shows gas is not being heated by gravitational contraction and collapse. New cosmological models require the existence of superfluid helium as constituents for the formation of stars and galactic black hole inferred centers. The phase change of liquid to superfluid helium just below 2.17 degrees Kelvin involves no latent heat, nor any specific volume change. No heat is released by the cold gaseous filament during the phase change of helium.



degreed scientist research writer blogger

6 responses »

  1. My spouse and I stumbled over here from a different page and thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see so now i am following you.Look forward to checking out your web page repeatedly.My page … diets that work

  2. If your theory is correct (cold Hi3 superfluid as the cause of infered black holes) then how do you explain the AGN photos that are used to infer the presence of a black hole/event horizon?
    Those photos are multi-spectric and image matter interaction made visable as heat. My limited knowledge of your postulate aside combined with a roaring ignorance of GR; what am I missing?

    • you’re missing the big picture of reality, by believing that General Relativity and Special Relativity is real. That’s why there’s unseen inferred “black holes” of gravity, dark matter, and only a few percent explainable visible universe. AGN’s are never seen, just the hot plasma accretion disk can be seen, and the x-ray jets, gamma rays, radio waves, are all plasma lab phenomena. Superfluid helium will emit x-rays, and light will not exit but be absorbed. Both are near absolute zero, and get larger when colder, because the impurities get ejected out as the temperature rises, which builds forms the accretion disk. Acquire knowledge yourself by abandoning old Einstein, all his equations are derived from electromagnetism, and by slipping in the G constant it causes all the dark matter confusion. The magnetic energy emitted by the milky way galaxy alone was measured by Carretti to be 10^54 ergs ! Need I cite hundreds more such facts?? This is irrevelant to GR and SR, and proves a very small fraction of the universe is explained by it.

      • Thank you for your informative reply. I have been following the PC/EU theories for some time. I remain hopeful that the PC/EU theories will someday gain the experimental financing that GR currently enjoys. It’s not enough to be right when you can’t find acceptance among the majority of your peers, despite the scientific proof that validates your points of view, because of a self-sustaining systemic rigidity at the university level.

        In addition, GR enjoys its current research levels because it was proven to be useful in making “extreme” weapons. And, like the early space program, research funding was more available to national defense projects (cloaked as pure exploration and consumer research) as opposed to understanding the secrets of the cosmos.

        For bettter or worse, our “national security” posture is still the driving force behind the allocation of national funding for pure research. I am not suggesting that we should change our defense research funding posture, but I am offering you a clear reason for the lack of interest by Congress and the university level research they can “justify” financing. It’s not that you don’t have good answers to the organizing principals of matter in the cosmos. The problem for the PC/EU community is that those who approve research funding are looking for answers to a different set of problems and are directing taxpayer dollars to those ends..

        I appreciate your blog and encourage you to “make it plain” whenever possible so that the non-scientific “taxpayers” can understand your points of view and thereby encourage Congress to redirect a reasonable portion of the scientific research funding budget to PC/EU.

  3. You are perfectly correct & these main-stream physicists are acting as ostriches to the open challenge. The very space-time concept,on which theories of relativity are founded, has been mathematically, theoretically & experimentally proved as baseless and openly challenged on the basis of published scientific articles. Since the very space-time concept has been proved as baseless the question of curvature of space-time being correct does not arise. Gravity has been shown to be an electromagnetic force as foreseen by Maxwell due to the curl/vortices of aether (the electric dipoles) in the published article 'Revised Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things' (; Sep 2010) Revised version of this article is available on vixra, General Science Journal, & World Science Database in my profile. Open challenge could be seen by everyone at… and… . I would like to keep you informed that the open challenge has been sent to almost all professors of physics & universities of the world and so far two retired professors of physics namely Jeremy Dunning-Davies of Hull University & Brian Cole of Columbia University accepted the challenge but both of them finally failed to show a single error in the articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward. In this regard exchange of articles between me & Jeremy is available on vixra, General Science Journal & Elixir Online Journal.World should force all the physicists of the world to join to accept the standing open challenge to produce the rebuttal article to the scientific articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward; the very well known & only accepted procedure of denying the scientific findings published in peer-reviewed journals.For their information of all concerned I would like to state here that every concerned physicist of the world is in total knowledge of the open challenge and they also know that they can do nothing about it technically & scientifically. They would have easily accepted the alternative paradigm of physics which emerges as the consequence of my scientific publications but that would reduce their degrees to trash and they will have to quit their jobs on the basis of morality. Besides there is fund flow of trillions of dollars annually for research in thousands of research institutions all over the world and once world comes to know that all these institutions have been knowingly wasting trillions of dollars of public money; then many (millions) heads would have to role.Thus all the main-stream physicists are maintaining a deliberate silence and ignorance of the open challenge but how long they can deceive the world as I have taken a vow that I will take this whole issue to its logical conclusion.

  4. Magnetic fields warp space-time, but not gravity. All galaxies are surrounded by bubbles that interact by magnetic fields to form stars. I am not clear on what you say is "the open challenge? It seems to be what I believed in all along, that the EM force is really the only force, that nuclear force and weak interaction force, is really EM. Electric and magnetic are the same, from perspective orientation alignments. So there could just be one force, and spin, as the fundamental basis for everything.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: